Wednesday, June 5, 2019

Narrative Warfare: YouTube Attempts Second AdPocalypse

After a morning trip to deal with some bureaucratic bullshit, I come back to see that YouTube's begun a second AdPocalypse. Some SJW soyboy cockgobbler whined about Steven Crowder calling him names. Yes, the one being mocked--rightly--below from Vox Media.

Someone's daddy didn't beat him enough as a child. That much is apparent. But, as true as it is that this simpering sack is the proximate cause for what went down one of the biggest targets hit--Steven Crowder, the one that sad soycuck wanted destroyed for mocking him--the real deal is that this is part of Vox Media (the soycuck's employer) vendetta against Pewdiepie. They couldn't get him specifically, so they threw their weight behind this wimp chimp wageslave of theirs to nail everyone they could so long as Pewds was one of them. Nailing Crowder and a big pile of shitlords, conservatives, reactionaries, and dissidents is actually secondary at best to the actual objective. Wussface is just the useful idiot employed to make it happen.

This is going to backfire, and soon. The Federal Government, under the God-Emperor, has begun anti-trust investigations against Google--which includes YouTube--and this can be seen as pre-emptive destruction to cover their ass. Instead it looks like YouTube, under Google's orders, is curating content and selectively publishing in violation of the law's Safe Harbor provisions. This means lawsuits, folks, bigger than those already making the rounds like what's going on in North America's anime scene for the same reasons (tortious interference).

The useful tech journalists and law commentators are already soliciting those demonitized or suffering video deletions to get in touch. I expect that soon they'll be touching law firms that handle contract and defamation matters as details become clear. This second AdPocalypse? It's going to hasten the fall of the current social media paradigm, and I welcome that destruction.

I have two things to say to those affected and concerned: (1) Make The Rubble Bounce, and (2) Build Your Own Platforms. The Supreme Dark Lord was not the only one who saw this coming; the gun channels has had Full30.com going for a while now because of the previous episode. Some of you may be able to make do with Bitchute for a while before the zombie horde comes for them, or stream on DLive, but ultimately a lot of you need to do what Red Ice did years ago: build your own site, your own platform, and build a membership that pays for it. SDR did that with Unauthorized.tv recently, and more of you will need to do likewise as you're able and make do with someone friendly to you in the meantime.

Why? Because once the Feds are finished, YouTube--and the rest of Google--will die within a year of being broken up and forced to operate independently so there's nothing to go back to once you're forced out. This Narrative Warfare maneuver is only going to end badly for the morons who ordered it.

3 comments:

  1. Bradford

    Will youtube finally be stripped of its 230 protection in the interim?
    At the very least it it's a prudent interlocutory measure.

    xavier

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Regulatory action against YouTube will go big or go home. What you should expect in the interim are civil suits by affected parties on grounds of tortious interference.

      Delete
    2. Bradford,

      I was reading a Twitter thread by an experienced lawyer about how difficult it is to fight back against deplatforming.
      Still with the latest Mazaban(tm) I wonder if affected can now add constitutional violations (Not just 1st amnedment) but illegal seizure of property (i.e. the scrubbing/erasing of videos or other content)?

      Another angle the affected should look at is unjust enrichment. Have Maza/Vox become unjustifiably enriched because the affected have been impoverished? (in crude layman's terms has Youtube given Maza/Vox payola by diverting the demonitized accounts to the former to further finance more deplatforming?)

      It's something to ponder even if lawyer counsel that it doesn't apply.

      xavier

      Delete

Anonymous comments are banned. Pick a name, and "Unknown" (et. al.) doesn't count.