Narrative Warfare: When Lawfare Backfires

Tonight on the Darkstream, the Supreme Dark Lord talks lawfare regarding a recent U.S. District Court decision goat-screwed Doordash for fucking over its employees.

The commentary is on point. These arbitration clauses are intended to be used to mitigate risk by gatekeeping access to a service behind a Terms of Service Agreement contract that goat-screws users and employees from suing. As many of the actors involved are also either wholly or partially converged by SJWs, and thus to the Death Cult, the effect was--until recently--meant to deny those deplatformed by the SJWs within those actors a means to fight back.

Then someone bothered to actually read them, and get them put before competent lawyers, to find out that they didn't design their clauses competently. In effect, the SJWs didn't properly test their game design before pushing it live (metaphorically speaking), and as such the system they erected didn't work as intended. This is how the Supreme Dark Lord has managed to get Amazon and Indiegogo (so far, Patreon to follow) to bend the knee.

Now we're seeing that the U.S. Federal Judiciary is also starting to pay attention. The SCOTUS decision the SDL mentions is here, and it will influence things going forward, and thanks to the SJWs wielding the praxis of this decision like the club it is people are now paying attention and finding the flaws in this scheme. Flaws found turns into paths to practical countermeasures, and now we're here.